Movie Review #1--The Exorcist
" For me, there's no greater horror film than The Exorcist"
~Radio Free Movie Review
"I have never read horror, nor do I consider The Exorcist to be such, but rather as a suspenseful supernatural detective story, or paranormal police procedural."
~William Peter Blatty
Though it is now over thirty years old, The Exorcist is still held up by many as the gold standard in horror. I recently sat down and viewed the film for the first time in order to relay my impressions of it to you, the reader. The movie begins slowly, building up towards the climax of the exorcism ritual. Characters are developed and the possession of Regan (a twelve year old girl) occurs in stages, until the point where her personality has been completely subverted by the evil within.
I tend to agree with William Peter Blatty about his story, The Exorcist, on which the film is based. It is not a horror. It is, however, a careful and compelling look at modern society and how we deal with guilt and the possibility of forces beyond our comprehension. Throughout the movie, the viewer is not meant to doubt the fact that Regan is possessed. That is established beyond the shadow of a doubt. However, due to the reluctance of modern science to entertain extreme possibilites, she is forced to endure a battery of medical tests and two misdiagnoses (the first of a nerve disorder, the second of a brain disorder). Incidentally, I found the medical procedure scenes to be the most chilling of the movie. The cold and clinical pain Regan was forced to endure as doctors blindly sought a cause for her malady was far more frightening than the over the top anguish caused by her possession. A current day possession would undoubtedly be handled this way, which I found contributed an element of realism to the beginning of the film. The emissaries of the church seem equally ill equipped to handle the monster they are faced with. Father Merrin, purportedly the closest thing the church has to an exorcism expert, bungles things and loses his life because of this. Father Karras doubts for most of the movie that Regan is actually possessed, but agrees to go along with the ritual because she fulfills the criteria the church states must be met before an exorcism can be performed.
Unfortunately, the concept of how possession would be dealt with in current times forms only part of the film. If you'd like to see a more indepth treatment of that subject, I recommend The Exorcism Of Emily Rose instead. The Exorcist is heavy handed as far as horror films go. Tactics such as fleetingly glimpsed demonic faces and contortionists running downstairs on the backs of their hands have become a cliche in our horror-inundated culture. No holds are barred in this particular movie. Through the use of '70s style gore and (amusing) '70s style special effects, the director attempts to shock and horrify us into believing that, yes, this is indeed a bona fide possession. However, such measures distance the viewer from Regan's character, as she eventually becomes a monster and no longer even bears the semblance of a child. If more of her had been kept intact, the horror element might have been accentuated, because in my mind, that was the truly horrible aspect of the movie--that an innocent individual, even a child, can be so taken over by mental illness or, in this case, a malevolent outside force. However, Regan is lost beneath the stage makeup and voiceover, and nothing is left to the imagination. At the end of the film, the viewer is left without any questions, as the conflict is neatly resolved. The insidious sort of horror that leaves possibilities open, that leaves threads dangling, would have suited better. I would like to see a version of The Exorcist in which the question of whether Regan is undergoing possession or psychosis is never answered--one that grapples with the idea of great evil more fully, and whether the capacity for it dwells in us all or is caused by outside, demonic influence.
In short, I found the form of the film unbelievable, rather than the subject matter. The difference between evil and good are clearly delineated, with an ancient demon representing one and the church representing another. There are no grey areas in The Exorcist, which is unfortunate. In my experience, it is in the grey areas--in the fog of moral uncertainties and unknown causes, the mist of the probable impossible and of extreme possibilites--that true horror is born. Humans like the safety of a clear answer, which The Exorcist provides. What we are truly afraid of is the unknowable.
~Radio Free Movie Review
"I have never read horror, nor do I consider The Exorcist to be such, but rather as a suspenseful supernatural detective story, or paranormal police procedural."
~William Peter Blatty
Though it is now over thirty years old, The Exorcist is still held up by many as the gold standard in horror. I recently sat down and viewed the film for the first time in order to relay my impressions of it to you, the reader. The movie begins slowly, building up towards the climax of the exorcism ritual. Characters are developed and the possession of Regan (a twelve year old girl) occurs in stages, until the point where her personality has been completely subverted by the evil within.
I tend to agree with William Peter Blatty about his story, The Exorcist, on which the film is based. It is not a horror. It is, however, a careful and compelling look at modern society and how we deal with guilt and the possibility of forces beyond our comprehension. Throughout the movie, the viewer is not meant to doubt the fact that Regan is possessed. That is established beyond the shadow of a doubt. However, due to the reluctance of modern science to entertain extreme possibilites, she is forced to endure a battery of medical tests and two misdiagnoses (the first of a nerve disorder, the second of a brain disorder). Incidentally, I found the medical procedure scenes to be the most chilling of the movie. The cold and clinical pain Regan was forced to endure as doctors blindly sought a cause for her malady was far more frightening than the over the top anguish caused by her possession. A current day possession would undoubtedly be handled this way, which I found contributed an element of realism to the beginning of the film. The emissaries of the church seem equally ill equipped to handle the monster they are faced with. Father Merrin, purportedly the closest thing the church has to an exorcism expert, bungles things and loses his life because of this. Father Karras doubts for most of the movie that Regan is actually possessed, but agrees to go along with the ritual because she fulfills the criteria the church states must be met before an exorcism can be performed.
Unfortunately, the concept of how possession would be dealt with in current times forms only part of the film. If you'd like to see a more indepth treatment of that subject, I recommend The Exorcism Of Emily Rose instead. The Exorcist is heavy handed as far as horror films go. Tactics such as fleetingly glimpsed demonic faces and contortionists running downstairs on the backs of their hands have become a cliche in our horror-inundated culture. No holds are barred in this particular movie. Through the use of '70s style gore and (amusing) '70s style special effects, the director attempts to shock and horrify us into believing that, yes, this is indeed a bona fide possession. However, such measures distance the viewer from Regan's character, as she eventually becomes a monster and no longer even bears the semblance of a child. If more of her had been kept intact, the horror element might have been accentuated, because in my mind, that was the truly horrible aspect of the movie--that an innocent individual, even a child, can be so taken over by mental illness or, in this case, a malevolent outside force. However, Regan is lost beneath the stage makeup and voiceover, and nothing is left to the imagination. At the end of the film, the viewer is left without any questions, as the conflict is neatly resolved. The insidious sort of horror that leaves possibilities open, that leaves threads dangling, would have suited better. I would like to see a version of The Exorcist in which the question of whether Regan is undergoing possession or psychosis is never answered--one that grapples with the idea of great evil more fully, and whether the capacity for it dwells in us all or is caused by outside, demonic influence.
In short, I found the form of the film unbelievable, rather than the subject matter. The difference between evil and good are clearly delineated, with an ancient demon representing one and the church representing another. There are no grey areas in The Exorcist, which is unfortunate. In my experience, it is in the grey areas--in the fog of moral uncertainties and unknown causes, the mist of the probable impossible and of extreme possibilites--that true horror is born. Humans like the safety of a clear answer, which The Exorcist provides. What we are truly afraid of is the unknowable.
